Senate to the Rescue?

June 24th, 2008

Now that the house has passed the disastrous Protect America Act/FISA replacment “compromise” bill, it goes back to the senate, where senator Feingold has promised to filibuster it. Of coruse, the senate already passed the origional replacment bill, so I don’t hold out much hope that they will stop it this time around. Exspecially with Senator Obama flip flopping to the wrong side of the issue. This excerpt from an interview by Democracy Now with Senator Feingold shows that at least someone has got it right:

AMY GOODMAN: Who do you feel is in charge right now? Is it the Democrats or the Republicans?

SEN. RUSS FEINGOLD: Well, you know, on the domestic issues, the Democrats are doing pretty well, except for when we run into a filibuster. So we have been able to get some achievements. But whenever you come up against one of these national security issues, the President and the fear of Democrats of standing up to the President and the Vice President still have the trump card, and they seem to always win, on whether it be the Iraq issue or the Constitution or the civil liberties issues, because Democrats are still afraid to stand up and say, “Look, we know you’re using fear as a tactic, and we’re not afraid of it.” But unfortunately, they still have the trump card, despite the very low popularity of the President and the fact that it’s a lame-duck administration.

AMY GOODMAN: Senator Feingold, will you filibuster this bill?

SEN. RUSS FEINGOLD: We are going to resist this bill. We are going to make sure that the procedural votes are gone through. In other words, a filibuster is requiring sixty votes to proceed to the bill, sixty votes to get cloture on the legislation. We will also—Senator Dodd and I and others will be taking some time to talk about this on the floor. We’re not just going to let it be rubberstamped.

AMY GOODMAN: Would you filibuster, though?

SEN. RUSS FEINGOLD: That’s what I just described.

AMY GOODMAN: Senator Barack Obama last year said that he was opposed to granting retroactive immunity to the telecoms, but he has now indicated support for the FISA deal. Your thoughts?

SEN. RUSS FEINGOLD: Wrong vote. Regrettable. Many Democrats will do this. We should be standing up for the Constitution. When President Obama is president, he will, I’m sure, work to fix some of this, but it’s going to be a lot easier to prevent it now than to try to fix it later.

I’m disappointed with Obama on this. It probably won’t come back to bite him because anyone who cares about this issue doesn’t really have any other choice to begin with. I realize that he needs to “sprint to the right” to pick up the votes of the mainstream Americans, who for some reason don’t want their rights to be protected as much as they want their bodies/lives to be protected. It’s still sad to see how willing he is to throw us all under the bus to accomplish this. Of coruse, McCain and Hillary don’t offer anything better, they voted wrong, or not at all last time.

Telecom Immunity Up For Debate Again

June 19th, 2008

I can’t quote or link to the AP story (There is now a story I can link to over at Arstechnica on the new compromise.), but the Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives have agreed upon a compromised Protect America ActFISA replacement bill that includes telecom immunity. This ends 4 months in which the House did nothing instead of doing a bad thing. They have not yet passed this bill, so those outside of the committee that drafted compromise may still not pass it. There can be no compromise on telecom immunity for the reasons I outlined before.

The other big part of the compromise is that the government may not invoke war powers or other authorities to supersede surveillance powers in the future. Of course, they are already bared from doing this, hence the lawsuits they have incurred by doing it. Who is to say that yet another law against it will stop them in the future. You know what would stop them? If the people/companies in a position to enable the surveillance were so frightened of the repercussions for violating the law that they refused to help! I wonder how we could cause them to shake in their boots so? Oh maybe we could not provide them immunity from past actions, and make them pay for what they did. That way, next time they will know not to do it. End result, liberty is preserved; those who seek to destroy it, in this case the Bush Administration, are thwarted. Liberty must be protected against all enemies, not just the ones with guns.

Update: They passed it, see the ars story here. All I can say is fuck you Nancy Pelosi (and the other 104 democrats who voted for the bill), apologies and comparing it to an even worse bill don’t protect my liberties. Props go out to Denis Kucinich and Mike Capuano (my congressman) who did not vote for the bill. With everything else that happened this weekend I’m so disillusioned right now I can’t even comprehend it.

The You Tube Stars

June 14th, 2008

The You Tube Stars

There was so much good discussion in this panel that I didn’t want it to end. They started off talking about everyone’s first videos. iJustines’s first video was born out of quitting her job by making a dvd as a parting gift for her boss. Brookers’ first video was just a introduction for her mySpace page. This was, back before either mySpace or you tube were big. I hadn’t realized exactly how far back she was involved.

Brookers was, apparently, the first break out star of you tube. She realized this when she moved from getting constructive criticism to hateful comments. She has not made any money due to not selling out. I randomly clicked on some of her recent videos after ROFLCOn and discovered that I really don’t like her videos. However, wth Brookers unable to list the video she was proud of Mike steped in to suggest Cell Block Tango, which – I must say – is somewhat enjoyable.

In person she is very cute in the perpetually embarrassed shy kind of way. It is very strange for someone who is a performer. I guess that’s what you get from the internet. This was just what I picked up from watching her movements and expressions on the video and in person at the event. She later corroborated this story saying:

“In my town where I’m from in Holden. When I was in High School I didn’t exist, like I was so quiet I remember when half way through the year like sophomore year I raised my hand to goto the bathroom and everyone turned around, their like ‘who is that?’ like it was crazy so its really funny cause I have a few friends still from holden and everyone and everyone talks about, ‘hey did you hear some girl is like famous but nobody knows who I am.”

In the first few minutes Michael Buckley of the What the Buck show really sold himself. He described two different scenarios in the course of the development of his show where he received some positive feedback and just ran with things in that direction. This is how he moved from cable access to you tube and arrived at his one take, fast spoken format. I have actually seen his stuff, and enjoyed it, without knowing about him, or following him. That’s not true of any of the other panelists, what that’s worth.

Of course there was the necessary discussion about making money. Rhett & Link are all about selling out in order to do their work full time and support their families. Somehow I can respect them for this while holding it against Jib Jab. I suppose that I am familiar with the low level of quality coming out of Jib Jab, but I’m not familiar with Rhett and Link and as such I can’t actually compare. They are, however, still interested in managing user expectations, something Mike spoke to. Myabe this also plays a part in respecting their decision to sell out. The big revelation is that all the people who complain you’ve sold out still watch.

There were three things that I learned that surprised me. First, You Tube has a live component called YouStream? What? Apparently people don’t believe that it is actually live. I know I wouldn’t. Of course they make silly requests to prove it is live. Second, there is not much loyalty to You Tube with respect to other internet video sites. iJustine and Mike use other sites regularly. Rhett & Link have their own site. Brookers remains the most true to you tube, but not exclusive. Everyone was very adamantly opposed to leaving the internet for mainstream media, which was one of the first things Mike’s former agent suggested. Although, they are not very keen on all the random cat video’s that get all the attention on you tube. Finally, Both Mike and Rhett & Link cited recent videos they made about Hannah Montana. Is she really that big?! I mean this isn’t mainstream this is you tube personalities. I guess people are searching for it, so if you want people to find you, talk about what they are searching for, but it seems like pandering.

Some Quote Highlights:

“A lot of people enjoy it so I can’t really worry about the people who don’t.” – Mike

“Our family members don’t really understand how to watch you tube videos.” – Rhett and Link

“If you truly, like really, absolutely love what you made it doesn’t matter what anybody else says because you like it and that’s, you know.” – Brookers

“My family likes it because sometimes I forget to call home, so they can always just check my twitter to see if I am alive or check my rss feed.” – iJustine
“So they get to talk to you less” – Moderator

“I don’t think they [the mainstream media] know what to do with us.” – iJustine

You may think, that as I have done before whenever possible, that I’m going to go with a girl, Brookers or iJustine, for the standout panelist. Despite their great contributions I am not. Mike Buckley of What the Buck was by far and away the panelist who contributed the most. I may even start watching his stuff. I really enjoyed this panel. It was driven by the unique and interesting personalities of the performers.

Sleeper Hits of the Internet

June 14th, 2008

Sleeper Hits of the Internet

This “panel” was easy to watch and a refreshing change from the rest. Primarily this was due to it’s format as a collection of videos. There was some good original stuff from Bread Pig and Jib Jab. I’m not familiar with Jerry Time, so I did not appreciate their world premier short. I was intrigued by Respectably French’s Gunther teaser, but it really was just that a teaser trailer for their website. They showed these world premier videos and then went into a moderator selected playlist.

The Jib Jab stuff crossed the spectrum from good to interestingly stale. The first thing Jib Jab showed was a parody of a snoop dog music video with the faces of John McCain, Condoliza Rice, and Hillary Clinton. What in the world Condy was doing in the video I have no idea, but the other pairing is by now irrelevant. Of course, maybe it was not irrelevant in late April a week or so after Pennsylvania when this video was shown as a world premiere at ROFLCon, but not really. More likely this video had been in development so long as to come out far too late for it to even matter. This is a common problem with the old broadcast medium and current topical humor. Some shows, SNL, The Daily Show, and South Park have short enough production cycles on TV that they can get things out before they are too late. This problem is not generally associated with new internet media, and the fact that Jib Jab is suffering from this problem really indicates exactly how backwards they are with respect to how things are done on the net. They also had some public service announcement videos for the internet, titled “The Stuff You Learn.” The first two of these were spot on and the second two totally missed it. I really think Jib Jab has no idea what they are doing they just sometimes hit upon something, and most of the time not.

Standout Videos:
These are the best of the videos show, in no particular order.
Good:
Still pretty good.
Cool but Long:
These video’s failled to really keep my attention despite their quality.
Too Short:
More would be better of these.
I don’t Get it:
I can admit when I don’t understand what they are going for, and as such I can’t say weather or not the video is good or dumb
Just Dumb:
Like many videos on YouTube these are just too dumb to be worth watching.
Too Long and Dumb:
These are the worst, not only are they dumb, but they take more of your life away than the shorter version. These are the worst, yet the longest list – it is internet video after all.

Pwning for the Good of Mankind

June 12th, 2008

Pwning for the Good of Mankind

Pwning for the Good of Mankind

This panel was the worst so far for a variety of reasons. The moderator, Lana Swartz, failed to have the guests introduce themselves properly. Also, there was no real theme to bring this group together. They did start out with a brief explanation of what Pwning for Good means, but even this topic lacked definition and depth. The lack of focus was probably making the moderator’s job much harder. Only 23 minutes in she was grasping for questions to ask. This could be more of a sign of the lack of in depth discussion on any topic than the moderator’s fault. Once the panel was opened to audience questions, the focus did not narrow, but the questions and the answers got more interesting.

There was a brief, light discussion of net neutrality and how close the impending doom of a non-neutral net may be. The ALCU guy suggested that internet celebrities could coalesce around the issue and convince people to contact their representatives it could make a “stupid crazy difference.” Questioners kept circling back to this topic, indicating a good candidate for a panel next year. The ALCU guy ended up driving a lot of the discussion, which tended towards issues under his wing. He was able to provide insight, which the other players, beyond iJustine and to a lesser extent the Bert is Evil guy, did not even attempt.

There was some good discussion with regard to the making money on the internet panel. The Bert is Evil guy talked about how he didn’t make any money because his server went down and the meme turned into a web of mirror sites, some of whom did the usual money making t-shirt thing. But he never saw any of that money. Of course, he wasn’t in it to make money in the first place. iJustine revealed that she does do some projects that she has been paid for, but she does not want/will not let money to change what she does because it is primarily for fun. “A lot of the reason all of us are so successful is because we’re doing it out of passion.” Towards the end there was a discussion of astroturfing, attempts by the media usurp the power of the internet for their own benefit.

Throughout the panel, on the chalkboard, was a note saying “18:03 Exam Today.” At that time someone yelled out, it’s exam time. This was possibly the best part of the talk. Not that these other issues aren’t important, but they were not covered well.

Heat

June 10th, 2008

I think that blog post frequency, like thorough forethought is inversely proportional to temperature. I just don’t care about much of anything when its this ridiculously hot.


Courtesy cbiwind.org

First Boston Beach Trip

June 7th, 2008

Last Sunday I went down to the beach with some of my room mates and some friends of there’s. We went to Quincy on the south shore. As you can see from the panorama it was not very far from Boston, but it took us over an hour to get there. The South Shore Expressway was closed one exit before the one we needed to take so we ended up getting off of it 2 exits before we needed and winding our way through the city. We didn’t have a gps or a detailed map so we tried to stick to the big roads on our non detailed map, but we failed at that. It was quite the adventure. I got see a whole new side of Boston including Jamaica Plain, Roslindale, and Hyde Park. This is the route we took on the way there.


View Larger Map

It wasn’t the best beach, but it was perfectly good for kite flying. There was a good bit of clouds moving through the area brining with them enough wind to break my strings, again. But it was a lot of fun. It was my first really successful kite flying near Boston. I’ve taken my kite and attempted to fly it around here before but I failed because there wasn’t enough low to the ground wind to combat my shortened strings. Yesterday I found, after some running around, a local store that sells kite string like items. I picked up 150 yards of 36 lb. nylon string. I’m not sure exactly how strong my old string was, it was what came with the kite, so I’m guessing 30 or 50 lb. The store was closing so I just got what the shopkeeper recommended. I know the old stuff wasn’t nylon. I hope this stuff will be strong enough, at least to get me through till August when I’m going down to the Outer Banks. The $25 fee for a second checked back makes bring a kite down there too expensive, so I’m going to buy a new nice one there and mail it (or pay the $25 to fly it) back home. Here is another view of the beach because I really enjoy playing with making panoramas:

Stupid Six Baseball Mascots

June 4th, 2008

Another hilarious installment of the stupid six from the Woot.com podcast. Really, the stupid six is the best of their commonly done skits. I really like what they have to say about numbers 6, 3, and 2. But I can’t say more without revealing anything, so go have a listen.

On Being a Millennial

June 3rd, 2008

Tonight’s conclusion of the democratic primary season really got me thinking about some of the things that I read with regard to the ongoing controversy over Robert Lanham’s Generation Slap article. Can’t you just hear me wanting to say Victory by Obama, but not being able to actually say it because we’re only really half way there. I still think we can’t really rest until HRC either concedes or takes the VP spot. This “Clinton acknowledges delegate math” subtitle really doesn’t calm the nerves. But why am I so nervous? Why does this matter so much? Why do I fear the personal disillusionment a Clinton victory would have caused me?

I first stumbled upon this whole debate two weeks ago from a digg link to this seemingly copycat and less in-depth post. I was reading some more about it today because Tim’s blog brought up the topic and linked to a really well done rebuttal. The rebuttal really got me thinking, especially with the political aspects he brought up. I’m not one to really competently argue music culture with anyone educated on the subject, which was another aspect he hit on. But I’m highly invested in politics, which has surprised even myself. This is the bit I’ve been reflecting on:

[Generation X] got all the cool traits! Disaffection! Nihilism! Cynicism! Ironic distance! People just keep calling us idealistic….

As we grow up, it continues. According to the Washington Post, we’re “collegial.” And “Millennials, more than their elders, believe that U.S. political institutions will deal effectively with concerns the nation will face in the future.” We’re “sociable, optimistic, talented, well-educated, collaborative, open-minded, influential, and achievement oriented…”

Our optimism is every bit as ignorant as [Generation X’s] cynicism is lazy….

…here’s the thing about our starry-eyed good faith in the system: We might very well be the first generation to elect a black president. That’s thrilling.

Alex Pareene

This is thrilling. What really struck me, and reinforced things enough to write about it is that this is effectively the same sort of thing that Tom Brokaw said tonight while discussing race, youth, Obama, and tonight’s place in political history. I will assert that I do believe that government institutions will, by implementing well designed and thought out policies, solve the problems facing my generation. Why do I think that? Maybe because if it doesn’t then we’re all screwed, that’s sort of a proof by contradiction for you. On the positive side the resounding and successful defeat of the gas tax holiday idea is a big, recent sign that governments can make correct policy decisions for the right reasons.

It took someone else to say it for me to realize it, exactly how much idealism drives my motivations. This is why I am a democrat despite the fact that I’m not convinced that their solutions are the right ones. This is why, I, and the vast majority of my generation support Obama, who promises to deliver a reintroduction of reason, honesty, and the big Millennial thing – openness – to government. Openness is the ground work for debate that works to provide solutions. The open source movement and other open/transparent entities have shown what you can do with that kind of groundwork in place.

The interplay between the discussion and the real world affirming events have me really embracing and feeling a connection to my generation, which has not been a common thing for me. The feeling is not so much as a coalescing in response to attack, but positive thing. When I read the initial article I wasn’t even sure if I was being attacked. As I am among the eldest of the Millennials I’ve never been sure which side of the blurry line I fall on. This discussion has done much to clarify that for me.

The personal disillusionment avoided by the presumptive selection of Obama as the democratic presidential candidate is so affirming because he alone, of the three, offer this open and transparent path. Without that path — with the, as Jon Stewart put it last night, “willful deception” of Bush; the blatant, trivial, and outright lies for Clinton; or the complete disregard for once held upstanding principles of McCain — the process I am counting on to solve our problems does not work. If we can’t solve our problems through government then I think disillusionment is the result, and so now that we have a good choice, we must make that choice in November!

BP Energy Talk

June 2nd, 2008

Last week at work there was a very good talk about energy and the challenges ahead. It was in fact a shorter version of this talk by BP Chief Scientist Steve Koonin. It has a lot of good facts at the start to inform discussion and many interesting opinions at the end to spark discussion. The summary of the talk is that we might as well leave oil alone as the energy source for transportation, as that is a paltry 14% of energy use world wide and focus on reducing carbon emissions by traditional electric power generation, which holds the lions share of the energy use pie.

This is somewhat counter to the ideas heard daily in the news media, because those focus mostly on transportation energy, due to the high demand for stories about how to beat gas prices. Dr. Koonin focused very little on the price of gas, only showing what types and quantities of unconventional oil are available at what price points. That made me feel somewhat relaxed, in that if the world can handle stable $140 a barrel oil there are literally trillions of barrels of unconventional oil that are profitable. The thing that stood out in my mind was his enthusiasm for fusion power. Not because he was overly excited about it. He gave one branch a 50% shot of ever working (I think that’s how it was phrased). It stood out because I’ve never heard someone in such a position do anything but laugh at the prospect of fusion power.

Another surprising thing was the way he pretty completely dismissed solar power. At one point he showed the cost of photovoltaic solar power as well off the chart. He did say that, if someone can bring the cost down a lot then it’ll be considered. I guess the take away is that it won’t be BP who brings that cost down. The one big question I had after the talk, but not soon enough to ask it, was “What about non photovoltaic, thermal based solar power?” I’m actually not sure on the efficiencies of thermal verses photovoltaic solar power, but I at least assume thermal must be cheaper per joule. Otherwise no one would use it because it requires much larger scale construction than does photovoltaic. Anyways, if you’ve got an hour and a half and are interested its quite refreshing to hear an oil companies perspective on all this. Its also quite informative.